oitsjustjose/Geolosys

Watch

[Suggestion] Prospector's pick testing for veins #186

New issue

Closed

opened 2019-04-20 17:33:28 +00:00 by import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ · 2 comments

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ commented

2019-04-20 17:33:28 +00:00

(Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com)

By default, the prospector's pick tests for surface samples and not underground veins if you are above ground. Unfortunately, this means that if you remove all the samples and test again, it appears that there are no samples underground, even though there are. It would be nice if it was the other way by default (since it is a config option) or was somehow clarified.

By default, the prospector's pick tests for surface samples and not underground veins if you are above ground. Unfortunately, this means that if you remove all the samples and test again, it appears that there are no samples underground, even though there are. It would be nice if it was the other way by default (since it is a config option) or was somehow clarified.

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ commented

2019-04-22 17:46:18 +00:00

(Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com)

This sounds like a good idea to explain the pros and cons within the config file 😄

This sounds like a good idea to explain the pros and cons within the config file :smile:

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ commented

2019-04-22 17:47:46 +00:00

(Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com)

mentioned in issue #180

mentioned in issue #180

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ (Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com) closed this issue

2019-06-08 21:36:33 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No labels

can't replicate

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference

oitsjustjose/Geolosys#186

No description provided.