Should be board size be configurable? #5

New issue

Closed

opened 2018-04-07 16:52:40 +00:00 by import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ · 2 comments

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ commented 2018-04-07 16:52:40 +00:00 (Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com)

Copy link

Currently we hard-code the board-size at 32x32, should this be configurable with a command?

board_size x_dimension, y_dimension

Currently we hard-code the board-size at 32x32, should this be configurable with a command? `board_size x_dimension, y_dimension`

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ commented 2018-04-09 16:00:51 +00:00 (Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com)

Copy link

My vote is no - I think that's complicating things further than they need to be in the end. The easier we can make this project, the better.

My vote is no - I think that's complicating things further than they need to be in the end. The easier we can make this project, the better.

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ commented 2018-04-15 00:29:15 +00:00 (Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com)

Copy link

I like this answer, lets keep the current size, and have it be non-configurable.

I like this answer, lets keep the current size, and have it be non-configurable.

import_user_oitsjustjose_95mQ (Migrated from git.oitsjustjose.com) closed this issue 2018-04-15 00:29:15 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag specified

Branches Tags

master

No results found.

Labels

Clear labels   

bug

  

duplicate

  

enhancement

  

good first issue

  

help wanted

  

invalid

  

question

  

wontfix

No labels

bug

duplicate

enhancement

good first issue

help wanted

invalid

question

wontfix

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No items

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Subscribe

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference

oitsjustjose/CPSC4100#5

No description provided.